We identify where automation creates value — and where it creates risk. You get a framework your board can approve and your engineers can build from.
We research your organization before our first conversation. Then we interview 5-8 stakeholders across functions to understand how decisions flow. We map every decision: who makes it today, what triggers it, what happens when it's wrong.
For every decision in the initiative, we define: who owns it, what limits apply, what triggers escalation, what conditions require a full stop, and what must never be automated. We make ownership explicit. Not implied. Not assumed.
We validate the authority framework with your leadership and the people who will live inside it. We deliver board-ready documentation your executives can present and engineer-ready specs your team can build from.
These aren't abstract governance principles. They're operational specifications that tell your team exactly how decisions work when automation is running.
Named ownership for every automated decision. Not a department, a person with clear accountability.
The boundaries within which automation can execute without human review. Dollar amounts, risk levels, exception types. Every threshold is defined.
What triggers escalation, who receives it, how fast they must respond. No decision falls through the cracks because nobody was designated.
Conditions under which automation must stop entirely. Who has override control. What happens during the pause. How it restarts.
Decisions that commit capital, change contracts, or create compliance exposure require specific human authorization before execution. These are identified and protected.
Decisions where automation creates more risk than value: relationship-sensitive, regulatory, strategic, or reputational. Flagged explicitly with reasoning.
We are architects, not builders. We define the blueprint: who decides what, within what limits, with what authority. Your team builds the automation. We make sure it knows its limits.
Our Decision Governance Platform powers every engagement. It captures decisions in real time as interviews happen, maps decision relationships across your organization, and generates both board-ready and engineer-ready deliverables automatically.
You see progress as it happens, not in monthly status calls. Your leadership team and your engineering team work from the same source of truth. And the output is consistent every time, because the platform enforces the methodology.
The platform is not available for purchase or licensing. It's proprietary to Mesa Point: the infrastructure that makes our methodology repeatable, rigorous, and fast.
We walk through the platform live on every discovery call.
Decisions mapped as interviews happen. No waiting for reports or status updates.
Leadership sees progress, gaps, and risk in real time throughout the engagement.
Board summaries and engineering specs generated from one source of truth.
Same rigor on every engagement. No variance between projects or consultants.
When the engagement is complete, governance transfers to your designated executives. Your engineering team has the specs they need to build. Your leadership has the governance framework they need to oversee.
We don't implement. We don't manage ongoing operations. We don't create dependency. Implementation, operation, and ongoing governance remain with your organization, where they belong.
Executive summary with risk assessment, governance framework overview, and governance recommendations they can present with confidence.
Decision logic, approval thresholds, escalation routing, integration requirements, and test criteria. Everything they need to build it right.
Named owners, defined limits, clear accountability. No ambiguity about who decides what when automation is running.